AHT Definitional Criteria
Patients were sorted as abused if and when any of the following were true.
- Primary caregiver admission of abusive acts
- Primary caregiver denial of any head trauma, even though the pre-ambulatory child in his or her care became acutely, clearly and persistently ill with clinical signs subsequently linked to traumatic cranial injuries visible on CT or MR imaging
- Primary caregiver account of the child’s head injury event that was clearly historically inconsistent with repetition over time
- Primary caregiver account of the child’s head injury event that was clearly developmentally inconsistent with child’s known (or expected) gross motor skills
- Two or more categories of extra-cranial injuries considered moderately or highly suspicious for abuse, including:
- Classic metaphyseal lesion fracture(s) or epiphyseal separation(s)
- Rib fracture(s)
- Fracture(s) of the scapula or sternum; fracture(s) of digits
- Vertebral body fracture(s), dislocation(s) or fracture(s) of spinous process(es)
- Skin bruising, abrasion(s) or laceration(s) in two or more distinct locations other than knees, shins or elbows
- Patterned skin bruising or dry contact burn(s)
- Scalding burn(s) with uniform depth, clear lines of demarcation and paucity of splash marks
- Confirmed intra-abdominal injuries
- Retinoschisis confirmed by an ophthalmologist
- Retinal hemorrhages described by an ophthalmologist as dense, extensive, covering a large surface area and/or extending to the ora serrata.